MEMBEDAH DIALOG ACARA DUA SISI “UU ORMAS MENCIDERAInDEMOKRASI?” DENGAN TEORI BREAK DAN PENDEKATAN LINGUISTIK FORENSIK: KAJIAN POLITIK HUKUM
Keywords:
Language, BREAK theory, forensic linguistics, SPEAKING
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 371 timesAbstract
A crime is not just a physical force, it will still be a crime can also be done through language. Forensic linguistics is a language science that analyzes crime in terms of what criminals are used. the research in this article discusses a two-sided event with the theme of "ORMAS legislation offending democracy?" the data in this study is the speech of the source and also the text of ORMAS law which will be discussed with the main theory of BREAK and the supporting theories is the theory of leniency in language and also policy analysis in forensic linguist's view.
References
Agyekum, K. (2008). The pragmatics of Akan greetings. Discourse Studies, 10(4), 493- 516. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445608091884.
Chaer, Abdul. 2007. Pengantar Linguistik Umum. Rineka Cipta.
Coulthard, M., & Johnson, A. (2010). The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203855607
Gibbons, J. (2003). Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470758670
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2014). Halliday's introduction to functional gram-mar. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431269
Heydon, G. (2019). Researching forensic linguistics: Approaches and applications.
Hymes, Dell. (1972). ‘Models og the Interaaction of Language and Social Life. Dalam Di-rections in Sociolinuistics. Diedit oleh Dell Hymes dan Jhon J. Gumperz. New York: Holt, Rhin hart and Winston.
Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2020). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728
Mahfud MD, Moh. 2013. Perdebatan Hukum Tata Negara. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers.15
Olsson, J. (2008). Forensic linguistics. Continuum. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350934351
Johnstone, B. (2018). Discourse analysis. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119407096
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2016). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies (pp. 23-61). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020.n2
Revita, Ike. (2013). Pragmatik Kajian Tindak Tutur Permintaan Lintas Bahasa. Padang: Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Andalas.
Sawirman, Yusdi, M., Hadi, Novra. (2015). Lingustik Forensik: Volume 2. Padang: Pusat Studi Ketahanan Nasional Universitas Andalas
Sawirman, Yusdi, M., Hadi, Novra. (2014). Lingustik Forensik: Volume 1. Padang: Pusat Studi Ketahanan Nasional Universitas Andalas.
Sawirman. (2014). e135 Reader: Media Meliput Teror. Padang: Pusat Studi Ketahanan Nasional Universitas Andalas.
Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H. E. (Eds.). (2015). The handbook of discourse anal-ysis. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2004). Nexus analysis: Discourse and the emerging
internet. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203694343
Wiratno, Try. (2010). “Analisis Percakapan Terhadap Drama Kapai-Kapai Karya Arifin
C. Noer” dalam Jurnal Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra, Vol 22, No. 1, Juni: 117-132.
Sudarto. 2018. Hukum Pidana 1 (edisi Revisi). Semarang: Rizka Jati.
Yule, Geroge. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge
University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481499 Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2015). Methods of critical discourse studies. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tM-QY4BIPTMy.diunduh22/11/2017.
http://www.google.co.id/search?q=perpu+nomor+2+tahun+17&client=ucweb-
b&channel=sb.diunduh22/11/2017
Subyantoro, (2019) Linguistik Forensik: Sumbangsih Kajian Bahasa dalam Penegakan HUKUM, Adil Indonesia Jurnal Vol 1 No. 1 Januari 2019.
Chaer, Abdul. 2007. Pengantar Linguistik Umum. Rineka Cipta.
Coulthard, M., & Johnson, A. (2010). The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203855607
Gibbons, J. (2003). Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470758670
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2014). Halliday's introduction to functional gram-mar. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431269
Heydon, G. (2019). Researching forensic linguistics: Approaches and applications.
Hymes, Dell. (1972). ‘Models og the Interaaction of Language and Social Life. Dalam Di-rections in Sociolinuistics. Diedit oleh Dell Hymes dan Jhon J. Gumperz. New York: Holt, Rhin hart and Winston.
Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2020). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728
Mahfud MD, Moh. 2013. Perdebatan Hukum Tata Negara. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers.15
Olsson, J. (2008). Forensic linguistics. Continuum. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350934351
Johnstone, B. (2018). Discourse analysis. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119407096
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2016). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies (pp. 23-61). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020.n2
Revita, Ike. (2013). Pragmatik Kajian Tindak Tutur Permintaan Lintas Bahasa. Padang: Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Andalas.
Sawirman, Yusdi, M., Hadi, Novra. (2015). Lingustik Forensik: Volume 2. Padang: Pusat Studi Ketahanan Nasional Universitas Andalas
Sawirman, Yusdi, M., Hadi, Novra. (2014). Lingustik Forensik: Volume 1. Padang: Pusat Studi Ketahanan Nasional Universitas Andalas.
Sawirman. (2014). e135 Reader: Media Meliput Teror. Padang: Pusat Studi Ketahanan Nasional Universitas Andalas.
Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H. E. (Eds.). (2015). The handbook of discourse anal-ysis. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2004). Nexus analysis: Discourse and the emerging
internet. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203694343
Wiratno, Try. (2010). “Analisis Percakapan Terhadap Drama Kapai-Kapai Karya Arifin
C. Noer” dalam Jurnal Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra, Vol 22, No. 1, Juni: 117-132.
Sudarto. 2018. Hukum Pidana 1 (edisi Revisi). Semarang: Rizka Jati.
Yule, Geroge. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge
University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481499 Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2015). Methods of critical discourse studies. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tM-QY4BIPTMy.diunduh22/11/2017.
http://www.google.co.id/search?q=perpu+nomor+2+tahun+17&client=ucweb-
b&channel=sb.diunduh22/11/2017
Subyantoro, (2019) Linguistik Forensik: Sumbangsih Kajian Bahasa dalam Penegakan HUKUM, Adil Indonesia Jurnal Vol 1 No. 1 Januari 2019.
Published
2024-12-20
How to Cite
Astuty, & Susilowati, T. (2024). MEMBEDAH DIALOG ACARA DUA SISI “UU ORMAS MENCIDERAInDEMOKRASI?” DENGAN TEORI BREAK DAN PENDEKATAN LINGUISTIK FORENSIK: KAJIAN POLITIK HUKUM. Judge : Jurnal Hukum , 5(03), 66-79. https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v5i03.960
Section
Articles
